Yes, I understand that many people have only read "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows" once, when it came out in 2007, so when they saw the movie they were in awe. I get it. But don't call yourself a die-hard Harry Potter fan if you thought that the movie was good. I'm sorry but it's true.
The movie diverted from the book so drastically that it was almost a different story. You would think that people who read almost 800 pages of a book would care more about a movie- that would for sure guarantee millions of dollars in profits, by the way- being true to the text that they spent HOURS reading. Honestly, people.
And movie producers, let's talk. What was wrong with the original text? Hmmm...
Released globally in 93 countries, Deathly Hallows broke sales records as the fastest-selling book ever. It sold 15 million copies in the first 24 hours following its release, including more than 11 million in the U.S. and UK alone. The previous record, 9 million in its first day, had been held by Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. The novel has also been translated into over 120 languages, including Ukrainian, Swedish, and Hindi.
So these movie producers are saying that the book (fastest-selling book ever), was not good enough to make into a movie, so they had to change critical moments. Do you remember how much you paid for your Harry Potter #7 book? $34.99 compared to the $8.25 you spent on your movie ticket, meaning you obviously committed more to your book than to the movie, so I guess it makes sense that the movie is only one-fourth as good as the book. Maybe that also means that they only have to commit to one-fourth of the text, and only one-fourth of the important moments in the END of the book.
So, if you read the Harry Potter series, you read over 4,000 pages, spent at least 115 hours reading (that is how long the books are on CD), and at least 95 dollars buying the books (if you bought them in hardcover version, you definitely paid more, and if you bought them as a set after they all came out, you could have paid less). All I'm saying is that the Harry Potter fans cannot lower their standards. If a movie producer thinks they can take epic literature (that has changed children's literature, by the way) and make movies out of it, they at least have to be true to the biggest moments of the book, like good destroying evil. Just a thought.
1 year ago










